Must read article on Global Warming….. Learn something today!

( – promoted by Rob “EaBo Clipper” Eno)

Fantastic article about Global Warming and how the actual trend of warmer weather lasted about 20 years from the late 70s to the late 90s.  But something happened in September 1996 until today – the trend stopped!  So the period of NO Global Warming has now lasted 17 years and 5 months.  

The author asks the awkward question ‘What is the trend when the period of no global warming is as long as the period of global warming?’.  

Read the article here:

But the record of satellite measurements of global atmospheric temperatures now shows no warming for at least 17 years and 5 months, from September, 1996 to January, 2014, as shown on the accompanying graphic. That is surely 17 years and 6 months now, accounting for February.

When the period of no global warming began, the alarmist global warming establishment responded that even several years of temperature data does not establish a climate trend. That takes much longer. But when the period of no global warming gets longer than the period of actual global warming, what is the climate trend then?

And get this:

Even worse for the theory of catastrophic, anthropogenic (human caused), global warming is that during this now extended period of no global warming mankind’s emissions of the carbon dioxide (CO2) that are supposed to be predominant in causing global warming continued to explode, with one third of all CO2 added to the atmosphere since the industrial revolution occurring during this period. The Economist magazine shocked the global warming establishment with an article in March, 2013 that began with this lede:

“OVER the past 15 years air temperatures at the Earth’s surface have been flat while greenhouse-gas emissions have continued to soar. The world added roughly 100 billion tonnes of carbon to the atmosphere between 2000 and 2010. That is about a quarter of all the CO2 put there by humanity since 1750.”

So for 17 and a half years there has been no global warming regardless of the fact that we (humans) have dumped 100,000,000,000 tons of carbon into the atmosphere.  Go figure!

The study was done by REAL scientists who added this commentary:

The conclusion of the report is that the U.N.’s IPCC has exaggerated the amount of global warming likely to occur due to mankind’s emissions of CO2, and the warming that human civilization will cause as a result “is likely to be modest and cause no net harm to the global environment or to human well-being.” The primary, dominant cause of global climate change is natural causes, not human effects, the report concludes.

And the cost of all this absolute foolish behavior related to global warming?

The biggest problem with the catastrophic, anthropogenic, global warming fantasy is that it is very costly for the economy. It is already delaying the Keystone Pipeline, which is privately financed infrastructure that would produce thousands of good paying jobs. Should be a no-brainer. The Administration’s policies are also sharply restricting the production of oil and gas on federally controlled lands. Then there is the Administration’s War on Coal, which threatens thousands of more jobs.

Oh but V3PN, the trend of no global warming is now over, isn’t it?

Moreover, the now extended trend of no global warming is not turning around any time soon. That increasingly established trend is being produced by long term natural causes. Even rank amateurs among the general public can see that the sun is the dominant influence on the Earth’s temperatures. Even the most politicized scientists know that they cannot deny that solar activity such as sun spot cycles, and variations in solar magnetic fields or in the flux of cosmic rays, have contributed to major climate changes of the past, such as the Little Ice Age, particularly pronounced from roughly 1650 AD to 1850 AD, the Medieval Warm period from about 950 AD to 1250 AD, during which global temperatures were higher than today, and the early 20th century Warming Period from 1910 to 1940 AD.

Real scientists – real science – real conclusions – real story.

About Vote3rdpartynow

  • RRRR
  • The left uses science like a drunk uses a lamp post: for support, not for illumination.

    Marc Pacheco is the worst of them. His coastal bailout and neighborhood tax on nitrogen are going to put entire neighborhoods out on the street.

    For global warming.