I’m pretty disappointed in tonight’s results. I wasn’t impressed with Gomez during the campaign and his letter to Deval was bad and unforgiveable in my book.
In fact, he was about as awful as you can get during the debates, bad on the radio, and shaky at best on policy.
I was confident Sullivan was going to win and would have been ok if Winslow won as well. But Gomez comes across as a phony and his campaign was a joke.
I’m unsure if I’ll vote for him in June (although I say that now being aggrivated….I will most likely vote for him because Markey is bad and I’m still aggrivated with Sullivan’s loss tonight), but maybe we should ask who should have run, but who didn’t. Maybe if we had better candidates, we would have a better chance in June.
Essential Question: Who should have run who didn’t?
Mary Z. Con
Thoughts??? Who would have been your ideal candidate pick????