Elizabeth Warren: I’m proud of my undocumented Native American heritage.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-G…

Lynda Smith, the amateur genealogist who unknowingly found herself at the root of the false “Elizabeth Warren is 1/32 Cherokee” meme introduced to the media by “noted” genealogist Chris Child of the New England Historic Genealogical Society, acknowledged in an email to me this past Saturday, May 12, that her statement in a March 2006 family newsletter upon which Mr. Child based his claim of Ms. Warren’s Cherokee ancestry was made with no supporting documentation. It was, in fact, an honest mistake that Ms. Smith now acknowledges is entirely without foundation.

In a May 7 email to Ms. Smith that she forwarded to me on May 12, Mr. Morningstar stated:

   

It also looks like Donald Richardson is just stating he saw this name on the marriage license and makes no mention of “Cherokee” either. Somehow this bit of “Indian/Cherokee” blood lore got grafted onto the article about O.C. Sarah Smith. There is no support for this however. There are rumors of Indian blood along this line SOMEWHERE (or associated families) but it doesn’t appear to be supported by any documents. The extant documents do show O.C. Smith living in White American society with no apparent tribal affiliation. Also, her parents Wyatt and Margaret (Peggy) testified in court in TN…to verify John Curtis/Dolly Honeycutt marriage in Chatham NC in 1793. This would indicate a couple that was part of Anglo/settler society. Margaret in particular is a little mysterious at this point, but the fact that she is allowed to testify in court and has knowledge of a marriage in Chatham NC in early 1790s wouldn’t point to a connection with a Cherokee community. Wyatt is found in more documents and he is clearly not affiliated with the Cherokee community. He was from early settler stock.

Sam Morningstar also confirmed my earlier reporting that marriage license applications were not used in Logan County, Oklahoma in 1894, though he cites an earlier start date for their use (1897) than I had speculated. His source, however, the President of the Logan County Genealogical Society, is likely to defer to the research into this issue currently being conducted by the most authoritative source on the matter–Logan County Court Clerk ReJeania Zmek.

   

This might be of interest to you: the president of the Logan county genealogical society stated that they only had marriage licenses and certificates in 1894 – there was no “application” until 1897. The forms didn’t ask for race and the 1894 documents for William J. (listing O.C. Smith) does not contain a notation for “Cherokee.”

So, Ms. Warren claimed, and is still claiming, Native American heritage in an effort to … what exactly? Enhancing her hiring prospects by using affirmative action and a claimed minority status seems to be the only logical explanation.

Why she is still claiming this heritage when it has been proven completely false says a lot about her integrity. As Progressives often claim, they are only interested in “what works”. They’re just being pragmatic. When “what works” is demonstrably proven to most definitely not work they never admit that they were wrong.

Elizabeth Warren is wrong to claim Native American heritage. She was wrong to use unsubstantiated claims of that heritage for any reason, most specifically personal gain. And instead of admitting the fact that her family lore has been proven to be false, she insists she’s still proud of a heritage that does not belong to her. That speaks to her integrity. Since she has none, why would anyone vote for her to be a United States Senator.

About TLCWeld

Chairman, Reading Republican Town Committee Constitutional Conservative As a son of NH, I choose to Live Free or Die