The problem with Climate Change beyond if it is man made or not

At risk of being labeled a fanatical flat-earther I am not a believer in global warming climate change, but the biggest part of my skepticism comes from this simple fact:

Karl Popper, the late, great philosopher of science, noted that for something to be called scientific, it must be, as he put it, “falsifiable.” That is, for something to be scientifically true, you must be able to test it to see if it’s false. That’s what scientific experimentation and observation do. That’s the essence of the scientific method.Karl Popper, the late, great philosopher of science, noted that for something to be called scientific, it must be, as he put it, “falsifiable.” That is, for something to be scientifically true, you must be able to test it to see if it’s false. That’s what scientific experimentation and observation do. That’s the essence of the scientific method.

But for all of the 1990’s it was getting hot because of global warming and the record summer highs, drought conditions in some areas, and a few mild winters proved it.  That was followed by it stopping to continue on those highs and then very cold winters, snow in places for the first time in decades (and some in over a century) and you were an idiot if you ever thought global warming (now climate change) ever meant it was only going to get cold.

To summerize:

No matter what happens, it always confirms their basic premise that the world is getting hotter. The weather turns cold and wet? It’s global warming, they say. Weather turns hot? Global warming. No change? Global warming. More hurricanes? Global warming. No hurricanes? You guessed it.

Nothing can disprove their thesis.

At this point I will not even entertain any talk or debate on the subject until some supporter of climate change (man made or otherwise) can tell exactly what has to occur in the real world for the theory to be disproved until that time it is not science but fanatical faith.  It is pointless to continue to debate the topic until the purveyors of this theory will at least admit there is a way to disprove and debunk it.  All many of the debates in this world I think too much time is being argued over results when the real question and debate should be the underlying assumptions that are used to make the argument.

(in case you are wondering I believe the overwhelming fact in the weather has nothing to do with us and is almost all about solar activity)

About m.kelliher.gibson