About the word RINO; why there are none in Mass.

Sometimes in conversations among Republicans, and more often on sites like RMG, you here the word “RINO,” a derogatory acronym for “Republican in Name Only.”

When I worked in DC (long ago) it was usually used by people from states that were socially conservative, to describe Republicans from states that were more socially liberal, and voted with their constituents. Rarely, it was used with regard to taxation and spending. But should it not be? Were all the Republicans in Congress from 1998-2006 RINOs because they spent so much money and expanded government so much? Why, then, were they not labeled as RINOs, if Republicans are committed to limited government?

Regardless, I never liked the word, and have never used it. It declares that there is some set of Republican principles carved in stone somewhere. It seemed to me like an act of self-destruction for party members to label who is, and is not, authentic. After all, is the success of a party not measured by how many people flock to its banner?

I can see the problem that powerful and popular state parties can have. People might jump on the bandwagon who aren’t really faithful to what you stand for. So, I imagine that there are DINOs in Massachusetts.

But how could there be RINOs here? Who the hell would adopt the label “Republican” when the brand is so unpopular, and there are so few party members in office? Nobody. In my mind, anyone who publicly identifies themselves a Republican is the real thing. If someone in Massachusetts is gay and pro-choice and calls himself a Republican, I would say, “Damn! You must have some super-powerful beliefs about limiting the role of government. Welcome aboard!”

So why is “RINO” thrown around so often? It’s easy to explain: Because of the influential, omnipresent media, lots of people have a national Republican identity, and not a state-level one. They therefore judge other Republicans in Massachusetts against a national scorecard. Or, even worse, they tune in only to very severe right-wing media, which isn’t trying to appeal to ordinary Republicans.

Therefore, some Republicans are “mentally” living in a middle-of-the-road state like Pennsylvania. They sometimes see RINOs around them. Others, who consume a lot of far-right media, are mentally living in Wyoming or South Carolina. They see RINOs everywhere, and they are outraged.

If some Republicans do not consider themselves political citizens of Massachusetts, I have no problem with that. Please rent a post office box in Nebraska and vote absentee, OK? Because for those who mentally exist as citizens of Massachusetts, there are no RINOs here, only people trying to figure out how to be a Republican in a very hostile environment. Some of them, due to their experience, will actually be much stronger than the Republicans who live in more friendly environments, where it is much easier to be Republican “in name only.”

About edfactor

  • Republican Ram Rod Radio

    Would it make you feel better if we invented a different word to describe Republicans who don’t share some of our Pro-Life views?  

  • It is so overused.

    I have a hard time calling anyone who governs or legislates in accord, or to the Right, of their constituents a RINO. In that sense, I dont consider Scott Brown nor Mitt Romney ‘RINOs’. In some respects being a loyal and diligent representive on behalf of the people you represent and representing their will is the highest form of conservative governance. Elites, oligarchs, snots and liberals are the ones who dictate what is best for the people, even if they have to impose their will on the  people they represent.

    It also bugs me because if a party stand for whatever its occupants says it stands for. If everyone to the Left on Jim DeMint, Mike Lee and Jeff Sessions are RINOs, wouldn’t that really make them the RINOs since they are the overwhelming minority? Today, everyone from Mitch McConnell (apostate leader) to Paul Ryan (TARP apostate)to James Inhofe(Earmark apostate) Chris Christie (cap and trade apostate) to Richard Burr (DADT apostate) to Roger Wicker (START apostate) to John Coryn (NRSC apostate) to Jane Norton to Sue Lowden to Bill Bennett to John Boehner,… are so-called-RINOs. Maybe, that what a Republican is these days.

    What troubles me is the way activists conflate conservativism and Republican politics; principles and policy; party politics and the culture war…

    They are two different battles. Some conservatives, in the name of purity, misuse the political playing field to the detriment of both the Party and conservatism.

     

  • Reagan was a RINO, according to recent Dippies.

  • Since we are looking to redefine this word anyway:

    RETARD

    Republicans Elsewhere That Alienate Reagan-Democrats