Last week we were treated to an exciting posting entitled Psuedo-Con Tim Cahill’s Plan? Balance state budget on backs of cities and towns “
In this post it was revealed that Cahill stated he would have cut funding to local communities before he would have considered cutting funding for the Quinn bill.
While opinions seemed split, a good number of posters took the position that Cahill was being a hack and that the Quinn bill was nothing more than a giant payoff to the police unions.
In the interest of fairness it should be noted that we no longer have to wonder how Baker would handle the exact same question.
The Herald reports that he took the exact same position as Cahill.
Thou shall not stand up to public service unions.
It is a cardinal rule amongst our state “conservative” elite.
****Scoring update! Originaly no points were awarded for this question. Cahill’s point for answering a tough question was quickly lost for giving the wrong answer. In light of the latest information a point is now awarded; to Deval Patrick who is beginning to appear to be the true conservative in the race in light of Baker’s new plan to halt the civilian flagger program