Drunk with power: The David Kravitz Edition

Stay Classy David

They were on the radio – Coakley, Scottie, and the other dude.  Having not heard a word of it, I can confidently state that Coakley won, having not declared that she was opposed to babies, puppies, or apple pie.  😉

The candidates debate again tonight.  This one’s televised, but not live; you can watch it at … wait for it … 8 a.m. Sunday morning.  HA HA HA HA!!

It’s nice to see that BMG believes in a vigorous debate between the candidates.

Oh and David, Martha has come out against babies, multiple times.

About Rob "EaBo Clipper" Eno

  • Sadly, EaBo, our friends on the left have already elected Sen. Coakley. As I have said in a prior post if all the military related voters, Republicans, disatisified independents vote in January Scott has a chance. It is a long shot but there is a chance.

  • Having not heard a word of it, I can confidently state that Coakley won, having not declared that she was opposed to babies, puppies, or apple pie.  😉

    She is opposed to babies.

  • nomad943

    Did anyone actualy catch snippets from the TV debate that they did last night (for later airing)?

    What I am reading is that they were asked a question about what they would do if they met a starving homeless man on the streets in this COLD holiday season … and while Brown and Kennedy gave standard soup and cup of coffee type answers, Coakley went off the edge with some answer about how she wouldn’t give the guy a penny , HOWEVER she does give to the appropriate (and deductable) corporate type charities, those being the same ones that leave the guy out there starving and freezing to begin with …

    I am wondering how such an image; Martha kicking snow at some frozen homeless guy while padding here own ego about all the good she has done while lowering her tax burdon, and also not recognizing the humanity she just willfully ignores … how does such a cold image play with the general public in this holiday season?